Driving the filament with hobbed / knurled bolts
My quite efficient hobbed bolt :) |
Now, molten plastic still does not flow easily through our tiny nozzles (~0.4 mm), and the force to be applied is quite high. Pushing the filament manually gives a good idea, as one hand is barely enough. Since necessary value may be 15 or 20 Kg of traction, this is where problems start to arise given the small filament diameters (3 mm or even 1.75 mm).
A hobbed bolt must provide a good grip on the filament and/or a high contact pressure to prevent the filament from slipping. Slipping is to be avoided because the quantity of extruded plastic is then less than expected: you get bad prints and it makes fine tuning impossible. Sure, the viscosity of the plastic could be lowered a bit by increasing the temperature but it has too many side effects to be worth a strategy (this "trick" is only used when printing very fast nowdays).
Existing hobbed bolts
The early days
Historically, hobbed bolts were made using regular M8 bolts which threads were modified. But they were both hard to make and not reliable. And they too often grind or strip the filament.
V1 ultimaker bolt. Using crisscrossed grooves reduces the filament twist due to the stock thread. |
The V2 ultimaker tapped bolt. Not on the bolt thread. Making it requires a tap, and is really not easy to get a nice result. |
And a lot of 3D-printed tools have been designed to help making regular teeth in the bolts, with more or less success. Of course, the best results are achieved by using a lathe, a tool which is not common in the average house.
Cutting teeth in the threads of a bolt with a dremmel tool (Elk on thingiverse). Having the filament roll on the thread will twist it though (a bad side effect). |
M8 hobbed bolts regularly grind the filament...
Actually, filament stripping/grinding occurs when the teeth are too small or too sharp.And it is worse than slipping since the filament may get damaged to the point that feeding will not restart on its own. See below how it got carved to the point that the hobbed bolt has not enough material left to resume the feed. You need to attend your printer and give it some manual help to get it restarted, which is just painful and time consuming.
Filament pieces ground to the point they won't resume - from Richrap (who found ball bearings in his filament!) |
Now, this is a bit contradictory. Too sharp/small/many teeth tend to grind the filament, while not enough will let it slip. Also, tapping the thread is quite difficult and it results in lots of spikes, that in turn make your hobbed bolt a file instead of a hobbed bolt...
Machined and modern hobbed bolts
Nowdays, the hobbed bolts are most always made with precision CNC machining. Only old timers or purists still makes their own... While resellers of 3D printer can at last sell reliable bolts, they are expensive and calibrated bolts does not necessarily mean that they are efficient...
The V3 machined bolt by Ultimaker: too small a diameter imho. I just did not want to upgrade to this. |
The MK6 machined bolt by Makerbot. I tried it for a while, but I did not realize it was so small: the teeth just did not provide the grip I expected from such a beautiful thing. |
The stainless steel MK6 bolt is expensive. I bought one for my filament feeder because I liked the bigger diameter. But I was disappointed because it just kept on slipping whenever the temperature was lowered. I had to crush the filament to have it grip PLA, but that was making it oval and less prone to slide in the bowden tube as a consequence (even though my bowden has a bigger diameter than the stock one). OK, it is better than grinding but it still was not reliable...
Other bolts do exist of course, that I never heard of really but that look good, such as the following two.
The Raptor's brass spur gear (a bit aggressive but one very good way to go), and Camiel's hobbed shaft (mendel-parts) |
Some of the "modern" hobbed bolts shown above are probably very good, especially the gear-based ones. Before I even knew about these, I had built one of my own... and I still use it because it works flawlessly for me, though I tried different machined bolts since.
What we really ask for is an excellent grip but without damage made to the filament, else it will start grinding or will deform the filament up to the point that it will increase friction in the bowden tube (Ultimakers...).
Small diameters are bad
Because of this and in my opinion small diameters are bad. Period. Forget it. I mean, think about it twice: a small contact surface make your bolt teeth dig far in the filament like needles. And while rotating, long teeth will just rip the filament as they do not move linearly with the filament. If you lower the bolt pressure on the filament, you will not have a contact big enough to prevent slipping. Small diameters require narrow teeths, and these will end as filers.
In this regard, profezzorn probably made one of the most aggressive grip ever by using a dremmel bit! The idea is nice, but I never was able to find big diameter bits. This one is so small that the contact area is probably a fraction of a millimeter: if it ever starts to slip a little bit, then you'll probably cut the filament in two (hey, after all, it is sold as a "high speed cutter"!)
Small teeth are bad
Looking for a bigger diameter is something that talks to me : you get a bigger surface to grip the filament, so you don't need to dig into it and damage it too much. That was the reason I left the Ultimaker M8 diameters out and switched instead to the expensive MK6 bolt. But is failed imho... those shy teeth just let the filament slip whatever the pressure I apply! I sold it back to a friend with a 1.75mm filament-based rostock printer, and I reverted to my good own bolt.
I remeber also another extruder prototype (though I better like the name "feeder") that was featured razor blades! It probably had a killer grip, but I never heard about it outside of its web page. Actually, I even failed to find the link back with google (let me know if you find it!) It was made out of transparent plastic such as laser cut acrylic or so, and it had a very big diameter. Well, may be it was just cutting too much of the filament or the designers' fingers? ;)
Actually a lot of people tend to focus only on the capability of the bolt to grab and force the filament into the nozzle. I already said it was one of the most important properties indeed. But...
First of all, it depends on the filament nature: for example, nylon is often springy and will stretch a lot compared to PLA, while ABS is softer and will deform easily but the let the bolt dig deeper in it, and require less idler tension. By the way, what is the "best" idler tension in this regard? When the filament is soft, the bolt teet ay be shorter and thicker. When the filament is extremely hard, they could be razor-like without the need for being long...
So I do not think that there is any single good measure nor setup for a driving bolt. The maximum traction may not be the better : the setup must also minimize friction elsewhere, especially with bowden tubes. To illustrate this, think about replacing the idler with a knurled non-rotating surface and for sure you will get a higher traction... but no better print! ;)
Finally, some may like a bolt that is able to let the filament slip a bit instead of carving it stupidly to the point it will never re-engage (as I had before). Overextrusion happen all the time so a bolt that is able to slip a bit without incurring much damage to the filament is also an desirable property. Mine works very fine with respect to this, but if I screw the idler completely and the filament is of high quality, it grabs it so much that the bowden tube gets stripped in place of the filament!
I remeber also another extruder prototype (though I better like the name "feeder") that was featured razor blades! It probably had a killer grip, but I never heard about it outside of its web page. Actually, I even failed to find the link back with google (let me know if you find it!) It was made out of transparent plastic such as laser cut acrylic or so, and it had a very big diameter. Well, may be it was just cutting too much of the filament or the designers' fingers? ;)
Only trying to achieve the best traction may be a bad strategy!
A discussion on the reprap forums made me think about it, and feed this paragraph and this dedicated post.Actually a lot of people tend to focus only on the capability of the bolt to grab and force the filament into the nozzle. I already said it was one of the most important properties indeed. But...
First of all, it depends on the filament nature: for example, nylon is often springy and will stretch a lot compared to PLA, while ABS is softer and will deform easily but the let the bolt dig deeper in it, and require less idler tension. By the way, what is the "best" idler tension in this regard? When the filament is soft, the bolt teet ay be shorter and thicker. When the filament is extremely hard, they could be razor-like without the need for being long...
So I do not think that there is any single good measure nor setup for a driving bolt. The maximum traction may not be the better : the setup must also minimize friction elsewhere, especially with bowden tubes. To illustrate this, think about replacing the idler with a knurled non-rotating surface and for sure you will get a higher traction... but no better print! ;)
Finally, some may like a bolt that is able to let the filament slip a bit instead of carving it stupidly to the point it will never re-engage (as I had before). Overextrusion happen all the time so a bolt that is able to slip a bit without incurring much damage to the filament is also an desirable property. Mine works very fine with respect to this, but if I screw the idler completely and the filament is of high quality, it grabs it so much that the bowden tube gets stripped in place of the filament!
Moon's bolt: the old way still makes sense!
M8 bolts still are convenient because they are not bulky and they match the ridiculously cheap 608ZZ bearings you get on ebay... Now, instead of using the thread, I realized I would get a bigger diameter by using the head! So here is my hobbed bolt :)
Made out of the head of an M8 screw: it looks "old school" but it has excellent grip and it just never grinds nor slips :) |
I have to agree that it's,well.. somehow ugly. But people stopped laughing at my french fablab when I upped the speed to 350mm/s with not the slightest slipping nor grinding on my Ultimaker and my filament feeder! Note that asking for such speeds does not mean it will move that fast, because the acceleration is capped, but it was damn fast anyway. The one above is new (as I made it for this post), but the "old" one dragged its ways through kilograms of PLA in the last 6+ months with one or two issues may be, I can't remember.
I think it works quite well for three main reasons:
- a bigger diameter than the usual M8 hobbed bolts (still bigger would be better imho though)
- the radial groove does leave room for the filament (ie. it cannot be totaly ground!)
- the teeth are square, they get into the filament on a large surface. Only their edge is sharp.
Marks left by my hobbed bolt in 3mm wood filament. See how much material is left for the filament? The filament central part is never damaged even when excessive pressure is applied. And when fully tightened, it is the bowden tube that gets stripped!! |
Actually, I think it does not "cut" its teeth in the filament but just embosses them. They are big and leave enough material in between them to create a huge grip but without destroying the filament. I remember one more machined bolt with a big diameters, but I failed to find it back. I think it had smaller & inside teeth may be, but I think it would probably work better than the smaller radius. I also remember that it was expensive ;)
How to make my hobbbed bolt
Update: Making a bolt in five minutes, really!
Isn't this the cheapest lathe you can get? |
I used a 50mm M8 hex head screw (50mm is the total length).
The only "special" and required tool is a dremmel |
Carve the groove with the dremmel while the screw is spinning |
And get this in the end. Make it deep! |
Using a tightened nut to mark regular sectors of 60° (first 6 marks) |
Halving the sectors with the help of two locked nuts (next 6 marks) |
A piece of folded paper under the hex key will prevent the bolt from rotating while you cut it! |
This is the kind of profile you should get. Sorry for the drawing, I did not find a quick way to make it completely regular in Inkscape. Well, it matches the reality here. |
Impact on the software setup
One last note: when you are not using a stock bolt, do not forget to change the steps/E accordingly in your printer firmware. For example with Marlin on my Ultimker, this bolt requires about 520 steps for one millimeter of filament (instead of the default 865, or 836 for a UM V3).
The former Cura had a nice wizard to set this up, which resumes to this: unplug your hot end, ask for 100mm filament manually, measure precisely how much really was output, and apply the ratio on the existing steps/E. What I did then is to use Daid's Marlin builder to set them by default in the firmware.
If you do not recalibrate the value you will get a massive over-extrusion due to the bigger diameter of this bolt.
You probably will be interested in the feeder design that goes along. And my opinion on the wrong idea that a bolt should never let the filament slip...
Excellent post, Jeremie! I wish me and my colleague knew this back in the day:) Still, very very useful! Passing it forward. I thought you might be interested in this http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:53316, since production of nozzles are tricky as well:) Cheers!
ReplyDelete...and this is an excellent comment, Jerril! I always postponed my "need" to make my own hot ends, partly because of the tricky nozzle. Your ideas and video just make it much easier and reliable. Thanks for sharing!
ReplyDeleteExcellent article and your reasoning makes a lot of sense to myself (though only new to 3DPrinting game, about a month)
ReplyDeleteCurious though as to how you 'mount' that in to your extruder? I wouldn't mind see a photo of it in place.
I second the request to show how this is mounted in your extruder.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the feedback and I promise, the feeder is the next article!
ReplyDeleteIt is one big piece on its own so I want to spend some time on the post.
-cheers
Jeremie Francois, I can't take credit for the link. However, thank you prosumerism for the link to my nozzle toolbox on Thingiverse!
ReplyDeleteJerrill
http://www.jerrill.com
Jeremie Francois, maybe you can give us a hint on how you mount it to the gear? Maybe a drilled nut with a stop screw or cotter pin through the nut and bolt would work.
ReplyDeleteHi all, I have finally posted my driver! http://betterprinter.blogspot.fr/2013/04/rollerstruder-filament-feeder-driver.html I hope you will like it; you should find your answers, just tell me!
ReplyDelete- Jeremie
Are you using stainless?
ReplyDeleteI tried your technique quickly on a stainless and non-stainless bolt yesterday. The results were promising on both but the stainless needed quite a bit more work. I only had time to do it free hand so the teeth got a bit irregular spacing but I'll definately do a more serious attempt soon.
The one I used were all regular steel bolts so far. But with time, two of my teeth halves folded/collapsed on the respective following teeth because they were carved much too thin (~0.3mm). Though it did not seem to have a negative impact on slipping, may be b/c the other half of the tooth was OK, or because 2+ teeth are in contact all the time with the filament.
ReplyDeleteNow, I made yet another new & bigger hobbed bolt this weekend, out of a very hard stainless steel sheet (3mm thick). I was suprised that I could work on it with the same dremmel cutting saws I used so far -- it required less than two of them. So if you can, I suggest you go with stainless steel, it will always be harder in the end, but you can trust the regular steel bolts.
Keep me upated if you make the feeder also :) Any suggestions is welcome :)
-Jeremie